One of the many “back blogs” that we’ve been queuing up to post… Again, a bit of history, but mostly pix…
We visited the Tower of London twice. (Thus actually paying for the Historic Royal Palaces membership. Heh.) So some of these pics are from winter (Jan) and others are from spring (May). So if you detect strangely vanishing and returning greenery, that’s why…
The name is a bit misleading and inclines people who haven’t been there to think that it’s a single building. Rather, it’s a complex — a fortress including a central tower, rings of buildings and towers, gates and battlements, a (disused) moat, two chapels, a garrison — the whole bit.
The Tower really got started in 1066, when William the Conqueror, having recently wrested power from the locals, needed a seat for government and, not incidentally, a stronghold from which to dominate the populace. So he commanded the construction of the White Tower (the central building in the modern Tower complex), starting from foundations and wall fragments that date back to the Romans. From there, the Tower complex was extended for about four centuries, continuing to serve as fortress and picking up duties as royal prison, execution grounds, and armory along the way.
It’s a bit hard to see, but in the lower left, you can just make out some of the old Roman foundations.
Today, the entire Tower complex is essentially a museum, though it is still inhabited by the Tower Guard (the famous “Beefeaters”). It also still functions as a real Royal military garrison, at least in limited ways — the Crown Jewels of Great Britain are housed in one of the buildings there and very serious guards with very big guns keep a close eye on them. However, if you’re clever enough to go in early January, you can get in to see the jewels without a 2 hour wait. ;-) (Still not allowed to photograph them, however.)
One of the most notorious uses of the Tower has been to hold royal prisoners (or anybody else who was important enough to merit real imprisonment, rather than just summary execution). Many of same prisoners never left the tower, or left it only as far as the headsman’s block on the nearby hill. Even Elizabeth I was prisoner there briefly.
(Incidentally, they have reproductions of the famous painting of Jane Grey up all over the place there. I can’t tell if it’s a kind of self-flagellating penance or if the romance of the tragedy appeals.)
But the widely known executions, like Jane Grey and Anne Boleyn, were really the smallest part. Many, many people met essentially anonymous ends there. When they excavated the floor of the “modern” chapel of the Tower complex (not to be confused with the medieval chapel, shown below), they found about 1500 unaccounted-for skeletons. No record of who they were. All clearly beheaded and buried anonymously and, presumably, ignominiously. We don’t even know what era they died there.
When we were there in May, they had an exhibit of Henry’s armor. (That’s Henry VIII, of course).
In Jan, before the Henry exhibit was on, we met a chap who had a bunch of armor gear available to play with.
Some miscellaneous inside architecture shots. (Yes, it’s dark inside. And hard to photograph. At least we didn’t have to photograph by candle light…)

View along one of the Inner Ward's curtain wall battlements, now a springtime promenade for tourists
We arrived on a day when they were demoing their siege equipment in the greensward-formerly-known-as-a-moat. Terran got to play with the toys. (Tee hee.) This one is called a “perrier”, pronounced “pear-ee-ur”. (No shit — the etymology goes back to Latin for “stone”, via French, pierre.) For scale, it’s probably about 20 feet tall at the top. It’s a counterweight-based stone-caster, similar in principle to a trebuchet. Unlike the latter, however, this one depends on human-power. The thing that looks like a weight, on the left, is actually just a fixture for the ropes (that you can just see dangling beneath it). You hang a bunch of big, burly guys (like, say, me) off the ropes and have them drop their body weight on them when the artillery commander gives the signal. We were only tossing water balloons and we managed to fling them all of about 50m. Woo — hardly a terror to the besieging hoards, I’m afraid. But we only had 4 guys — the historians/artillery commander claimed that there are medieval woodcuts depicting giant versions of this sucker with about 100 people acting as weights. Yike…
Another of the myriad of legends associated with the Tower concerns the Ravens of the Tower. Apparently the story goes that the Tower will fall if the Ravens ever leave. This was a bit of a problem in the sixteenth century when the Royal Observatory was established there. Apparently, the Tower featured about 2000 of the birds at the time, which was enough to… Well, “obscure” the optics of the instruments, if you will. But they clearly couldn’t kill all the ebon intruders. So since then, they’ve maintained a small flock of tame ravens on the grounds. To cover all the bases, though, they clip their wings, so the birds are stuck there…
(You may ask: Why were there so many ravens there? Well, aside from the bloodthirstyness alluded to above, there’s the small fact that the moat was misdesigned, so it didn’t drain properly into the Thames. As a result, everything that went into the moat, stayed in the moat. And, of course, in that era, it was most common to dump all of the… detritus of the fortress straight into the moat. Mmmm….)
My grandmother on my father’s side was born a Boyer. She once pointed out to me that there’s a Bowyer tower in the Tower of London. I’m not entirely clear on whether our family is connected to this bit of architecture in any way, but I couldn’t resist going to find the tower. (It turns out that its major claim to fame now is that some poor bastard got hisself murdered by being drowned in a barrel of sack [white wine] there.)
We were particularly struck by the juxtaposition of this ancient fortress, nestled into the midst of a bustling modern mega-metropolis.
















Wow, this was fascinating (pictures and history both). I ended up following the Lady Jane Grey link and learning about her (horrifically tragic and short) life (new to me). Wow.
And that final picture you posted — amazing! The composition, colors, and lighting almost make it look Photoshopped, it’s so good. :) (I love the crane, too — an excellent touch!)
I ended up following the Lady Jane Grey link
Yeah, unfortunately the web version of the painting really doesn’t do it justice. The original is in the National Gallery in London. We’ve been a couple of times now, and it always catches my eye. The painting is immense — perhaps 10 or 15 feet high — and the lighting and mood and textures of it just jump out and grab you. It’s an intense thing to see in person.
And that final picture you posted — amazing!
Thank you! That’s a natural shot — my photoshop skilz are not that mad. ;-) Taken from one of the battlements near the NE corner of the Tower, IIRC.
[...] Ten centuries of might and fear [...]