A couple of weeks ago, while our friends David and Jen were visiting from Boston, we all went to Greenwich to visit the Royal Observatory.
Greenwich is probably best known as the baseline for both the Prime Meridian and the Greenwich Mean Time: 0º longitude and 0:00 hours.
And, of course, the canonical things to do when you’re there are to stand on the zero line…
… and to set your watch by GMT:
Sadly, these days the public clock display is set from GPS time, rather than an on-site master atomic clock. Oh well.
While it may not be entirely obvious, the fact that 0º and 0 hours are co-located is not at all a coincidence, nor is it just the whims of the British Empire in action. The two are actually quite fundamentally linked, at the level of physics and math. The small observatory museum had a fascinating discussion of the science and technology of location and horology.
The short-short story is that knowing your longitude can be reduced to knowing what time it is. Or, more precisely, knowing what time it is where you are relative to what time it is where you started. For example, if you can figure out that when it’s exactly noon to you, it’s 11:00 AM at your starting point, then you know that you’ve moved 1/24′th of the Earth’s circumference east. (More precisely, you’ve moved 15 degrees east, which is 1/24th of the Earth’s circumference, or roughly 1670 km, only at the equator. Close enough for this discussion, anyway.) So knowing time gives you distance. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to put your 0 time base on top of your 0 distance base.
Now, where you choose to put 0 longitude is a matter of convenience or, in practice, the might of the British Empire. But having done that, your time base is naturally set.
This is a familiar story to anybody who has read a bit of the history of technology or exploration. What I found really interesting was the museum’s history of horology, focusing on the Harrison chronometers of the Eighteenth Century. These were the first timepieces with sufficient precision and robustness to be used in practice for navigation. He built a series of chronometers in response to a contest to devise such a device, and the Royal Observatory Museum holds originals or replicas of the first four models, most in working condition. (The fourth, “H4″, ultimately won the contest.) They are fascinatingly intricate machines:
(Sadly, we weren’t allowed pictures in the museum itself, so this is a stock image grabbed from the ‘net.)
What really startled me, though, was the evolution of the chronometers. The H1, above, is about 3 feet tall, made of delicately machined brass. I have trouble guessing how heavy it is, but I’m sure that it would take a couple of people to move it around. H2 and H3 were similarly intricate, delicate, and bulky. But then, just a few years later, Harrison released the H4:
Looks like a pocket watch, doesn’t it? In fact, it is the great grandfather of all pocket watches — within a few years, it had been duplicated, miniaturized and was being mass produced for individual use. The H4 itself is too large to be a convenient pocket watch (you probably can’t tell without a scale, but it’s maybe 4 or 5 inches across), but compared to its predecessors it’s a model of compactness and elegance. It was incredibly startling to see three massive beasts of chronometers lined up, followed by something that looked nearly petite in comparison. It is both a reminder that recent memory is not the only era in human history when technology has advanced blazingly quickly and a vivid demonstration that getting the core design ideas right makes a huge difference in the final design.





Very cool! Did you stay long enough to see the laser that marks the meridian at night? Also, did they say anything there about the competing Paris Meridian that was used for a long time (up until the early 1900s I believe)?
No, we had to head back before it got dark, so we missed the laser. They did mention that a number of different prime meridians (meridia?) fought it out early on, with France being the longest hold out. (Big surprise there.) There was a similar fight about what the time zones should be and where the 0 time index should be located. That was won, in the end, apparently de facto: the BBC started broadcasting a time base (“At the beeps, it will be 7:00 AM”) on the newly invented radio. They broadcast, among other frequencies, in shortwave, so that as new stations came online across the world, they could pick up the BBC/Greenwich version of time. That quickly led to people standardizing on their time base. Ah, the benefits of being first in the tech curve. Now, if only they could figure out how to get licensing fees for GMT…
Oooh, I’m so jealous! I want to go there!
It’s always seemed awkwardly asymmetric to me that latitude coordinates are determined by the physical properties of a planet, but longitude must be arbitrary.
if you can figure out that when it’s exactly noon to you, it’s 11:00 AM at your starting point, then you know that you’ve moved 1/24′th of the Earth’s circumference east.
Too bad you can never actually precisely know that, since information can’t travel faster than the speed of light between you and your starting point. ;)
And don’t get me started on what they did for time on Mars…
History-wise, have you read “Longitude” by Dava Sobel? It chronicles the race for a sufficiently accurate ship chronometer in an engaging and fascinating fashion.
Ok, I suspect that the margin of error introduced by speed of light delays is small enough to be acceptable for wind-powered ship navigation. ;-)
But I guess it’s a serious consideration for modern, high-precision navigation and location. (Aside: for those who read this far and weren’t aware, GPS also fundamentally uses time to calculate position. It just does it way more precisely. So much so that you have to compensate for factors like the differential flow of time due to the difference in gravitational field between ground and orbit.) I’m sure that they have all sorts of cool corrections for such lags.
Re: Sobel. No — I have heard of that book, but not read it. I like that kind of history of science stuff, so I’ll have to put that on my reading list. :-) Most of what I knew about these events (before I went to Greenwich, anyway), I picked up from, I think, Burke’s books. (Pinball Effect, Connections, or The Day the Universe Changed).